FIA penalize Williams after they breach the budget cap rules

The FIA imposed a monetary sanction on Williams after the Grove-based team violated part of the 2021 financial standards.

A Williams F1 car in a file photo. (Image: Twitter/Williams Racing)
By Niranjan Shivalkar | Jun 8, 2022 | 2 Min Read follow icon Follow Us

For the 2021 season, F1 adopted a whole new set of rules, as well as a $145 million dollar budget ceiling on performance and car-related expenses, which this year runs at $141.2million. The FIA imposed a monetary sanction on Williams after the Grove-based team violated part of the 2021 financial standards. Strict controls are in place to ensure that this cap is maintained and regulated, with teams liable for documentation related to their finances for submission to the FIA.

Why the Penalty ?

Teams must present an interim report of their spending against the Cost Cap for the period between January and April by the end of June each year starting in 2021. The financial regulations, under Article 5.1(b), outline that teams must submit their “Full Year Financial Reporting Documentation” by the end of March the following year. The FIA informed Williams of their procedural infraction the following month when the team missed the second deadline of 31 March 2022.

The Fine

Williams answered by acknowledging that they had broken the law and outlining the efforts they had taken to prevent doing so. They has accepted the ABA’s offer, which means they will be fined $25,000 and will have to present all necessary papers by May 31. The F1 team has filed the relevant papers, paid the monetary penalties, and paid the CCA’s related charges in preparation for the ABA, according to the FIA. Williams is the first squad to be penalized under the new financial rules.

Read more: No further upgrades for Williams in the near future races in Formula One championship

Williams did not overspent

Given proof that Williams had revealed the violation to the CCA ahead of the deadline, as well as Williams’ complete cooperation, the team was provided a ‘Accepted Breach Agreement’ a remedy to a procedural breach stated in the rules. It should be noted that, despite Williams’ infringement of financial restrictions, this does not imply an overspend in excess of the money amount authorized, Williams just committed a breach in respect to paperwork filing, resulting in the lighter punishment choice meted out by the regulating body.